Impact of Primary Tumor Location and Early Regression on Survival in Patients with Metastatic CRC
Results from recent clinical studies suggest the prognostic significance of the primary tumor location on the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A retrospective analysis of data from a single-arm open-label phase II clinical trial evaluated the impact of primary tumor location and its early regression (ETS - early tumor shrinkage) on the survival of patients with mCRC who received a combination of chemotherapy (FOLFIRI regimen) and targeted biological therapy (panitumumab).
Methodology of the Analysis
In the single-arm phase II clinical trial, patients with mCRC were given a first-line treatment combining FOLFIRI chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) and panitumumab (at a dose of 6 mg/kg) at 2-week intervals until disease progression. The retrospective analysis included patients from this study who were confirmed to be RAS wild-type (wt-RAS). The primary tumor location data were obtained from surgical protocols or pathology reports. Tumors located from the cecum to the transverse colon were classified as right-sided, and tumors from the splenic flexure to the rectum were classified as left-sided.
Data from imaging methods (CT or MRI) were used to evaluate ETS and disease progression. The influence of tumor location on ETS, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and resection rates were statistically analyzed. ETS was defined as a reduction in the sum of the largest diameters of tumor lesions by ≥ 30% within the first 8 weeks of treatment. The impact of ETS on PFS and ORR was also analyzed.
Results
For the 69 patients included in the assessment, the absence of RAS mutations (wt-RAS) was confirmed, with 9 of them also confirmed to have BRAF mutations. The primary tumor location was known for 52 of these patients. Forty-five of them (87%) had left-sided tumors. The median PFS for patients with left-sided tumors was longer than for those with right-sided tumors (11.2 vs. 7.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–3.77). Patients with left-sided tumors more often achieved ETS (53 vs. 29%). ORR and resection rates did not significantly differ between the analyzed groups. Achieving ETS was associated with longer PFS regardless of the primary tumor location (left-sided tumors: HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.22–1.29; right-sided tumors: HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.03–3.54).
Conclusion
This analysis confirmed the prognostic significance of primary tumor location on the outcomes of patients with mCRC who received a first-line treatment combination of panitumumab and the FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimen. ETS ≥ 30% was associated with longer PFS and better treatment responses regardless of the primary tumor location. These results suggest that ETS could help identify a subset of patients with right-sided CRC who have the potential to respond well to panitumumab therapy.
(alz)
Source: Köhne C.-H., Karthaus M., Mineur L. et al. Impact of primary tumour location and early tumour shrinkage on outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer following first-line FOLFIRI plus panitumumab. Drugs R&D 2019; 19 (3): 267–275, doi: 10.1007/s40268-019-0278-8.
Did you like this article? Would you like to comment on it? Write to us. We are interested in your opinion. We will not publish it, but we will gladly answer you.